• About
  • Published Works
    • Take Out Zine
    • Field Trip Factory
    • Ramen Zine
    • The Watercooler
    • Starpulse.com
  • Resume

Laura e. Crook

~ writer by day, batgirl wannabe by night

Laura e. Crook

Tag Archives: tv: bunheads

Bunheads 1×2 – For Fanny

19 Tuesday Jun 2012

Posted by Laura Crook in Reviews

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

amy sherman-palladino, television, tv: bunheads

First off, this is my 100th blog post! Thanks for taking this ride with me, everyone! Now on to the juicy parts:

If you haven’t watched the second episode of Bunheads (or are worried about spoilers should you watch it in the future), stop reading now. Cuz I’m about to get all spoiler-y right up in the beginning.

Ready?

Okay.

It was a huge mistake to actually kill Hubbell. There. I said it. I was on the phone with my mother last week, and she said what we all had been thinking: “I can’t believe they killed Hubbell so quickly.” But I had faith! I had hope! I was anticipating a coma, which would ensure that Hubbell was a looming force (much like Colin in Everwood), filling Michelle with simultaneous hope and guilt and providing drama for the rest of the season, culminating in a finale where Hubbell would either die (thus opening Michelle up to pursuing the budding relationship with a hypothetical attractive man she’d been pursuing all season, hint hint, cute lawyer friend who showed up in the last 30 seconds) or wake up from the coma (causing her to reevaluate her life and relationships again). See? I had the entire season all planned out for Amy Sherman-Palladino, and she had to go screw it up by actually killing Hubbell.

The thing is, she took a plot device that would have provided constant drama and character conflict and she literally drove him off a cliff. Well, not literally, because I think what happened was he took a corner too fast, but still. There’s no sadness, because, like Michelle, we don’t know Hubbell from Adam. I’m objectively sad because he was Cameron from Ferris Bueller, and I love Cameron from Ferris Bueller, but I didn’t care about Hubbell, so why should I care about his death?

Furthermore, the bunheads are completely insensitive. I know that they’re teenagers, but Boo was the only person to say “really? We’re using Hubbell’s death as an excuse to skip school and go see a Mark Wahlberg movie?” [Side note, Mark Wahlberg is the extremely topical movie star we’re going with here? The one teenage girls are dying to see? Well okay then.] It’s also very helpful that the bunheads decide that, to hell with Fanny’s crippling depression or 100% understandable grief, they want a ballet class, and they want it now. Sasha kind of comes to her senses, which helps, but still. There’s a difference between being a teenager and being a complete bitch.

And then they started crying about Mark Wahlberg and… I’m officially lost. What is happening on this show?

Not to mention Fanny (Hubbell’s mother) and Truely (Hubbell’s ex-girlfriend), who insist on having a loud discussion in front of Michelle about how Hubbell always loved Truely and true love never dies and they were magical together, weren’t they? Here’s a tip, and I know that I’m still single so I’m not the best person to weigh in on this, but if someone is truly in love with you (pun intended), then they’re not going to marry a showgirl from Vegas. They might not marry you, for a variety of reasons, but they’re not going to marry someone else. So nice try, Fanny, but you’re just making  Michelle feel horrible and giving Truely false hope that this dead man loved her unconditionally, because the evidence points out that… he didn’t.

If I was Michelle, I would say “fuck it, I’m going back to Vegas.” And then there would be no show. See? This is what happens when you kill Hubbell in the pilot.

I wanted to love Bunheads, I really did. And I’ll probably keep up a half-hearted viewership for the rest of the season run (only eight more episodes, after all, not much of a commitment). Maybe I expected too much–maybe I expected Gilmore Girls 2.0, and all the gloriousness that that entails. Bottom line is that I wanted to love Bunheads, and it disappointed me. I have never loved a pilot so much and hated episode two even more.

(I did tear up a little during the final scene when the bunheads pulled their heads out of their asses and performed a memorial dance for Fanny. I’m not made of stone).

Share it:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

Bunheads!

14 Thursday Jun 2012

Posted by Laura Crook in Reviews

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

amy sherman-palladino, tv: bunheads

If I’m completely honest, I was a little apprehensive about Bunheads. I love Amy Sherman-Palladino with my entire heart and soul–I was practically raised on Gilmore Girls (with a helping of Friends and Dr. Quinn). I also love ballet and watching dancers dance. I’ve never been a very good dancer, and I’ve never been able to command my body the way dancers do, so I love watching people who can.

So why was I apprehensive? Well, in case you missed the ads while you were watching Disney movies on ABC Family (I mean, how else do you spend your weekends?), Bunheads is about an “aging” (read: 25) Vegas show girl named Michelle (Sutton Foster). She’s pursued by the rich, not very charming, businessman Hubbell (Alan Ruck, also known as Cameron from Ferris Bueller). When Michelle gets snubbed at an audition, she realizes that in the crazy world of dance (much like the crazy world of modeling and pitching baseball), people peak a lot younger than in other industries. So she gets drunk with Hubbell, and agrees to marry him.

Let’s re-read that last sentence: Michelle, who up to this point has been dodging Hubbell’s monthly visits like the plague (even, on one occasion, faking the flu), who referred to Hubbell as “basically a stalker,” agrees to marry him and move to his sleepy coastal town. And Hubbell, who buys Michelle expensive presents even though she avoids his calls and visits, accepts Michelle’s “yes” even though she is clearly drunk and upset. He meant well, but who on earth thinks that this will turn out well?

Plus in all the promos there was this shot of Michelle and Hubbell walking into their house and it’s just filled to the ceiling with knick-knacks and pictures and stuffed animals and if that doesn’t scream “serial killer!” (or at the VERY least “unstable!”) I don’t know what does. I mean, come on, one episode of Gilmore Girls totally centered on Lorelai and Rory housesitting for a guy whose house was eerily similar to Hubbell’s house, and he was definitely crazy.

So I was apprehensive. But I gave it a try because a) it’s Amy Sherman-Palladino, b) it’s about DANCERS, c) I like to support female show-runners as a female myself. And you guys. This show did not disappoint.

One of the best aspects of Gilmore Girls is the three generation dynamic between Lorelai, her daughter Rory and her mother Emily. On Bunheads, that’s the same, except it’s between Fanny, her daughter-in-law Michelle, and four of Fanny’s ballet students– Melanie, Sasha, Ginny and Boo. Fanny is played by the wonderful, the indomitable Kelly Bishop (who previously played Emily Gilmore in Gilmore Girls), and there are definitely flashes of Emily in Fanny’s character… if Emily wore flowing skirts, taught dance and decorated her house with stuffed animals and Buddha statues. You know how it is.

The four bunheads are all wonderfully different and vibrant and adorable. You can tell that the only reason they’re really friends is because they’re all the same age and they grew up in the same tiny town with no movie theater, where the highlight of your Friday night is when the librarian leaves the public library unlocked so you can sneak in and read. Yeah. The point is, they’re all very different girls, and their dynamic is honest and genuine. They bicker, they lash out, they show off, and they comfort each other.

My favorite is probably Ginny, who has to wear two sports bras under her leotard to quell her ample bosom (been there, sister friend!), and wonders out loud… why couldn’t she have inherited her mother’s nose instead?

Or maybe Boo, who wants to dance so, so badly, but she doesn’t have the “classic” dancer’s body. Her passion for her art and her willingness to work hard transcends the physical limitations other people place on her.

I also like Sasha–brash, bitchy, talented Sasha–who has all the talent and none of the drive. Michelle makes a brief comparison to herself at Sasha’s age. Sasha is a little too forceful (like Michelle herself) for me to love her wholeheartedly. And she must have proclaimed, in a loud voice, that she was BORED, DAMMIT, at least three times in the pilot, so that was kind of annoying, but I can see her potential as a character and I’m excited to see what happens. Sasha is the kind of girl who is a dancer because she looks like a dancer and because she doesn’t have to work at it. She doesn’t have Boo’s drive or passion. I’m interested to see how her relationship to ballet evolves.

There’s also rambunctious Melanie, but it’s a little hard to pinpoint her character. I’m sure her time will come, but right now she seems a little bit like a Sasha clone.

Besides the three generations of women, there are other obvious Gilmore Girls parallels–the same score (and I have to say, hearing that music again feels like coming home), the same snappy dialogue and charming town of quirky busybodies. But it’s also starkly different: set in California, not Connecticut; focusing on dancing instead of pop culture. Amy Sherman-Palladino’s fingerprints are all over this show, but it’s a different animal than Gilmore Girls–in the best way possible.

After 42 minutes, all of my apprehensions were washed away and replaced with pure, glowing love for Amy Sherman-Palladino, dancers, and Bunheads. I’m excited to have a new show to focus on this summer–even if it’s just for 10 weeks.

The pilot of Bunheads is available for FREE download from iTunes! This means you have very little excuse not to try it out. It’s also available on Hulu. Bunheads airs Mondays at 9/8c on ABC Family.

Share it:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

♣ Laura’s Epic TV Watch List

I watch a ridiculous amount of TV. A full list can be found here.

♣ Weekly Features

Tamora Tuesday
Five Things Friday

♣ People I Love

  • Caro Griffin
  • Crook's Crossing
  • Megg Joosten
  • Pink Streaks
  • Rachel Pierce

♣ Places I Go

  • Forever Young Adult
  • The Bloggess
  • The Mary-Sue

♣ Archive

♣ Tags

adaptations amy sherman-palladino anxiety book: daughter of the lioness book: fire book: graceling book: harry potter book: protector of the small book: provost's dog book: song of the lioness book: the hunger games book: the immortals character showdown chicago christmas depression family film: alien film: prometheus film: the avengers Five Things Friday guest post joss whedon los angeles movie spotlight music poems politics Ramen reviews: books reviews: film reviews: tv running Sara Zarr tamora tuesday television tv: angel tv: buffy tv: bunheads tv: dollhouse tv: dr. horrible tv: firefly tv: game of thrones Whedon Wednesday writing

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Ignacio Ricci. Tweaked by Caro.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.